Profit Sharing System in Bugis Agriculture: Ethnographic Study in South Sulawesi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65943/62febp40Kata Kunci:
Bugis agriculture, distribution of results, ethnography, social relationsAbstrak
The profit sharing system is a traditional mechanism that influences the economic and social structure of Bugis agriculture, especially in income distribution, relationships between farmers, and management of production risks. This research uses a qualitative ethnographic approach to explore farmers' practices, perceptions and strategies in dealing with the profit sharing system. Data was collected through in-depth interviews with farmers and capital owners, participatory observation on agricultural land, and analysis of local documentation related to production sharing agreements. Thematic analysis was carried out to identify decision-making patterns, profit sharing mechanisms, and farmers' adaptation to production risks and uncertainties. The research results show that the success of a profit-sharing system depends on transparency, social agreement, and community negotiation skills, where farmers actively adjust production and profit-sharing strategies to make them fair and sustainable. This study emphasizes the importance of the profit sharing system as a means of risk management, preserving traditions, and economic empowerment of the Bugis agricultural community.
Referensi
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
Chambers, R., & Conway, G. (2020). Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century. IDS Discussion Paper.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
DeWalt, K. M., & DeWalt, B. R. (2011). Participant observation: A guide for fieldworkers (2nd ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.
Ellis, F. (2020). Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford University Press.
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2022). The state of food and agriculture 2022. FAO.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in practice (4th ed.). Routledge.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.
Pelras, C. (1996). The Bugis. Blackwell Publishers.
Rahman, A. (2022). Traditional agricultural institutions and profit-sharing mechanisms in rural Indonesia. Journal of Rural Studies, 91, 156–167.
Rigg, J. (2019). More than rural: Textures of Thailand's agrarian transformation. University of Hawai'i Press.
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). Sage.
Scoones, I. (2019). Sustainable rural livelihoods and rural development. Practical Action Publishing.
Scott, J. C. (1976). The moral economy of the peasant. Yale University Press.
Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Yusuf, M., & Putri, N. (2023). Agricultural profit-sharing systems and farmers' welfare in South Sulawesi. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, 20(2), 45–61.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Jurnal Administrasi Publik
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
