The Development of Performance-Based Seismic Structural Design Concepts in Indonesia: A Literature Review
Kata Kunci:
performance-based design, earthquake-resistant structures, nonlinear analysis, building resilienceAbstrak
Indonesia is situated in a region of high seismic activity; therefore, earthquake-resistant structural design constitutes a critical component of the national construction system. The conventional force-based design approach, which remains predominant in national standards, has inherent limitations in controlling damage levels and post-earthquake structural performance. In contrast, the concept of Performance-Based Seismic Design (PBSD) has evolved internationally as an approach that explicitly defines structural performance objectives. Although numerous studies in Indonesia have examined nonlinear analysis and building performance evaluation, integrated literature reviews addressing the development of PBSD concepts within the national context remain limited. This study aims to synthesize the development of performance-based seismic structural design and to identify its implications for enhancing building resilience in Indonesia. A qualitative approach was employed using a narrative literature review method covering national and international publications from 2000 to 2025, as well as relevant technical standard documents. The analysis was conducted through thematic categorization to map the evolution of conceptual frameworks, nonlinear analytical methods, and their integration into national regulations. The findings indicate that PBSD has evolved from a force-based approach toward performance- and displacement-based frameworks, supported by nonlinear analytical methods such as pushover analysis and nonlinear time history analysis. However, its implementation in Indonesia remains partial and requires strengthened regulatory frameworks as well as enhanced professional capacity. Systematic integration of PBSD has significant potential to improve safety, reduce damage risk, and strengthen the seismic resilience of building structures in the future.
Referensi
Applied Technology Council. (1996). ATC-40: Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Applied Technology Council.
Aranta, S. D., & Irawati, I. S. (2025). Evaluasi Kinerja Struktur Pada Desain Struktural Gedung Rumah Sakit Dengan Metode Pushover. Jurnal Permukiman, 20(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.31815/jp.2025.20.11-21
Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi, dan Geofisika. (2023). Katalog gempa bumi signifikan dan merusak di Indonesia. BMKG.
Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana. (2023). Data dan informasi bencana Indonesia 2022–2023. BNPB.
Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2019). SNI 1726:2019 tata cara perencanaan ketahanan gempa untuk struktur bangunan gedung dan non gedung. BSN.
Buckley, N. W. (2025). Research on seismic structural optimization design based on performance-based design methods. Ingegneria Sismica, 42, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.65102/is202511
Cheng, Y., Chen, Q., & Pang, W. (2025). Robust multi-objective optimization framework for performance-based seismic design of steel frame with energy dissipation system. Frontiers in Built Environment, 11, 1617542. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2025.1617542
Chopra, A. K. (2012). Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
Chopra, A. K., & Goel, R. K. (2002). A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 31(3), 561–582. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.144
Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2000). FEMA 356: Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA.
Kazantzi, A. K., & Vamvatsikos, D. (2015). Intensity measure selection for vulnerability studies of building classes. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 44(15), 2677–2694. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2603
Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele University Technical Report.
Kurniawandy, A., & Nakazawa, S. (2020). A Proposal of Seismic Index for Existing Buildings in Indonesia using Pushover Analysis. Journal of Engineering & Technological Sciences, 52(3). https://doi.org/10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2020.52.3.2
Nurhidayatullah, E. F., & Ardiyanto, D. (2025). Seismic Performance Study of Multi-storey Building Structures with Nonlinear Time History Analysis Method. Journal Of Civil Engineering Building And Transportation, 9(1), 62–79.
Priestley, M. J. N., Calvi, G. M., & Kowalsky, M. J. (2007). Displacement-based seismic design of structures. IUSS Press.
Rohman, R. K., Wibowo, R. G., & Afrianto, A. (2025). Seismic Evaluation of the Magetan DPRD Building in East Java, Indonesia Using Pushover Analysis. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 15(5), 26423–26429.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.12106
Taylor, M., Ridgley, N., & Clayton, P. (2023). Performance-based design in earthquake geotechnical engineering. I: Implementing Performance Based Design. Proc. 2023 Australia and New Zealand Conference on Geomechanics.
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(45), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45




