SYNERGY BETWEEN THE PENTA-HELIX MODEL AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IN ACCELERATING SUSTAINABLE TOURISM VILLAGES: A CASE STUDY OF KASSI TOURISM VILLAGE, JENEPONTO REGENCY

Authors

  • Andi Asyifah Rizky Nasta Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Maritim Balik Diwa image/svg+xml Author
  • Nur Asyifa T Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Maritim Balik Diwa image/svg+xml Author
  • Muhammad Iqbal Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Maritim Balik Diwa image/svg+xml Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65943/mgesmz55

Keywords:

collaborative governance, community development, Pentahelix, sustainable tourism, tourism village

Abstract

Developing a sustainable tourism village requires collaboration among multiple stakeholders and active community participation. The Pentahelix model provides a collaborative framework involving government, business, academia, communities, and media, while community development strengthens local capacity, participation, institutions, and economic opportunities. This study analyzes the synergy between the Pentahelix model and community development in accelerating the development of Kassi Tourism Village, Rumbia District, Jeneponto Regency. A qualitative Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was employed using scholarly articles, policy documents, and relevant literature on collaborative governance, the Pentahelix model, and community development. The findings reveal that Kassi Tourism Village possesses significant natural, cultural, and man-made tourism attractions, supported by community-based tourism services such as homestays, local culinary products, and tour guiding. Although all Pentahelix actors are involved, collaboration remains fragmented due to inconsistent stakeholder commitment, limited institutional coordination, inadequate infrastructure, weak promotion, and insufficient human resource capacity. Community development has strengthened local participation through the involvement of the village government, Tourism Awareness Group (Pokdarwis), Youth Organization (Karang Taruna), Village Consultative Body (BPD), and local entrepreneurs. The study concludes that sustainable tourism development requires institutionalized Pentahelix collaboration supported by continuous capacity building, participatory decision-making, effective communication, and equitable distribution of tourism benefits to enhance local resilience and long-term sustainability

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bramwell, B., & Lane, B. (2011). Critical research on the governance of tourism and sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(4–5), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.580586

Hall, C. M. (2011). A typology of governance and its implications for tourism policy analysis. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(4–5), 437–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.570346

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Scheyvens, R. (1999). Ecotourism and the empowerment of local communities. Tourism Management, 20(2), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00069-7

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

Wray, M. (2011). Adopting and implementing a transactive approach to sustainable tourism planning: Translating theory into practice. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(4–5), 605–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.566928

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.

Buhalis, D. (2000). Marketing the competitive destination of the future. Tourism Management, 21, 97–116.

Chamdani. (2018). Pariwisata Berkelanjutan. [Lengkapi data penerbit sesuai sumber asli].

Jumarding, A., et al. (2021). [Lengkapi data bibliografis sesuai sumber asli tesis].

Musleh, & Rosa. (2024).

Nur, A. C., Nur, A. I., Akib, H., & Koliopoulus, T. (2024). The importance of government collaboration strategies for developing tourism villages in Indonesia. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(4).

Palimbunga, I. P. (2017). Bentuk partisipasi masyarakat dalam pengembangan pariwisata di Kampung Wisata Tablanusu Kabupaten Jayapura Provinsi Papua: Kajian pariwisata budaya. Melanesia, 1(2), 15–31.

Pangestu, R. P. A. G., & Ma’ruf, M. F. (2016). Upaya pengembangan desa wisata untuk meningkatkan pendapatan asli desa: Studi pada Desa Wisata Bejiharjo Kecamatan Karangmojo Kabupaten Gunungkidul. Publika, 4(10), 1–10.

Ritchie, J. R. B., & Crouch, G. I. (2003). The Competitive Destination: A Sustainable Tourism Perspective. CABI.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-20

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Nasta, A. A. R., Asyifa T, N., & Iqbal, M. (2026). SYNERGY BETWEEN THE PENTA-HELIX MODEL AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IN ACCELERATING SUSTAINABLE TOURISM VILLAGES: A CASE STUDY OF KASSI TOURISM VILLAGE, JENEPONTO REGENCY. JURNAP: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 3(2), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.65943/mgesmz55

Most read articles by the same author(s)