Strengthening Computational Thinking in Information Technology Education: A Systematic Literature Review on the Development of Higher-Order Thinking Skills

Authors

Keywords:

computational thinking, higher-order thinking skills, information technology education, systematic literature review

Abstract

The advancement of digital technology necessitates the strengthening of higher-order thinking skills in Information Technology Education (ITE). One approach considered particularly relevant is Computational Thinking (CT), which encompasses processes such as decomposition, pattern recognition, abstraction, and algorithm design. Although numerous studies have examined the implementation of CT in educational contexts, systematic reviews that integrate the relationship between CT and Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) within the specific context of ITE remain limited and fragmented. This study aims to synthesize the literature on the conceptual construction of CT, analyze its relationship with the development of HOTS, and identify pedagogical implications within ITE learning environments. The method employed is a Systematic Literature Review of national and international articles published between 2015 and 2026, selected through a structured screening process. The findings indicate that CT demonstrates structural alignment with the dimensions of HOTS, particularly in the domains of analysis, evaluation, and creation. However, the effectiveness of CT in enhancing HOTS is conditional and highly dependent on instructional design grounded in authentic problem-solving, explicit reflection, and assessment practices that evaluate thinking processes rather than merely final products. The novelty of this study lies in the integration of CT and HOTS perspectives within a unified conceptual framework specifically tailored to Information Technology Education. These findings provide both theoretical and practical foundations for the development of ITE learning models that are more analytical, reflective, and oriented toward strengthening higher-order thinking skills.

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA).

Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051

Kafai, Y. B., & Burke, Q. (2015). Constructionist gaming: Understanding the benefits of making games for learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1124022

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka dan implementasi mata pelajaran Informatika. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia.

Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. EBSE Technical Report. Keele University & Durham University.

Lestari, D. (2023). Pengembangan instrumen asesmen computational thinking dalam pembelajaran informatika. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi, 7(2), 115–128.

Marsuki, A., Risal, A. W., Aprilo, I., Sulfa, M., & Ali, F. A. (2025). Improving Athlete Performance Through Technology-Based Sports Learning Innovation. Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 1(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.65943/02dw5210

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Rahmawati, Y., & Nugroho, A. (2022). Integrasi computational thinking dalam pembelajaran informatika di sekolah menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika Indonesia, 6(1), 45–56.

Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003

Suryadi, B., & Santoso, H. (2021). Tantangan implementasi computational thinking dalam kurikulum informatika di Indonesia. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 23(3), 201–214.

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215

Downloads

Published

2026-02-26

How to Cite

Herianti, H., Listari, A. W., Putra, A. N. A., Purnama, A. G., & Tri Ulandari, A. H. (2026). Strengthening Computational Thinking in Information Technology Education: A Systematic Literature Review on the Development of Higher-Order Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi, 1(1), 25-31. https://ojs.ucp.ac.id/index.php/pti/article/view/62